The long shadow of disagreement—those years of sharp, visible fracture within the chambers of global diplomacy—might, perhaps, be lifting just a little. A delicate shift, certainly. Ambassador Ibrahim Olabi, Syria's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, articulated the profound difference this December convergence represented: a historic moment, he insisted, where the Security Council, often stymied by its own internal geometries of dissent, presented a face of unified support.
It was a recognition that the steady, difficult work of reconstruction demands more than silence or discord.
Led by Samuel Žbogar, the Council’s president, the delegation arrived with the stated objective of mending the shattered lattice of trust, fractured by a decade and a half of internal Council squabbling over Syria’s fate. They came to listen.
They absorbed the specific, unfolding vision articulated by President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, a future shaped by immediate demands and long-term complexities. That immediate future, Olabi pointed out, remains marred by constant threat: dangerous Israeli attacks persistently interrupting the possibility of stability.
The cold, blunt instrument of international sanctions—their weight borne disproportionately by the civilian populace, the very people the Council is ultimately meant to protect—was central to the dialogue.
Olabi understood the weight of the turning point, the slow, sometimes excruciating crawl from international division toward shared, explicit consensus. That agreement, if maintained, might be the critical element for stabilizing a weary nation, restoring its complex, vital role in global equilibrium and the fragile architecture of international peace and security.
A unique hope, maybe the only one we have.
Damascus,Dec.4 (SANA) Syria's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ibrahim Olabi, described the Security Council delegation's visit on ...Other related sources and context: Visit website
